Open Access
Ali A. Alsudani
Department of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2017;11(1):15-21
https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.11.1.03 | © The Author(s). 2017
Received: 09/12/2016 | Accepted: 11/01/2017 | Published: 31/03/2017
Abstract

The study involved 120 samples collected from wards of the Al-Diwaniya Teaching Hospital, Iraq during the period from 5 April to 5 June 2016. The results showed that the percentage of the fungal contamination in the wards was 77/120 (64.1%), highest of the fungal contamination was recorded in the floors and walls and in the air 18 (90%), followed by patients (Nose, Ear and Hands) 14 (70%) and lowest contamination was in the instruments 3 (15%) when compared. A total of 125 fungal isolates were identified and the isolates belong to 9 genera comprising of Aspergillus spp with 52 isolates (mainly A.  niger= 24, A. flavus= 19, A. fumigates= 5 and A. ochraceus= 4). Penicillium spp with 17 isolates, Alternaria alternata with 14 isolates, Candida albicans with 11 isolates, Fusarium  spp 9 isolates, Mucor spp 7 isolates, Rhizopus stolonifer 7 isolates, Cryptococcus spp 5 isolates and Rhodotorula spp 3 isolates. The highest occurrence and frequency percentages of fungi recorded for A.  niger reaching (18.947%) and (19.2%) respectively, followed by A. flavus reaching (16.842%) and (15.2%) respectively with significant differences when compared with other fungi isolated in this study, while the lowest occurrence and frequency percentages recorded for Rhodotorula spp reaching (2.105%) and (2.4%) respectively. The antiseptics (Dettol, Hibitane and Formalin) have high inhibitory activity against the growth of all fungi studied when used at original concentration which was 10% compared with other concentrations 7.5, 5 and 2.5%. Formalin showed highly significant effect in inhibitory activity for the growth of fungi from Dettol and Hibitane, the percentage of inhibition when using Formalin at concentration 10% ranged between (85.2-95.4%) while for Hibitane between (68.1-79.7%) and for Dettol between (40.6-65.8%) at the same concentration.

Keywords

Antiseptics; Molds; Yeasts.

Introduction

Various microorganisms found in hospitals, molds and yeasts are considered the most important of it because it play a major role in making various infections to the inpatients in hospitals and these infections may be dangerous systemic infections especially for some people who suffer from Immunocompromised or who are taking Immunosuppressive drugs1. Some opportunistic fungal infections that can occurs in people who do not have any factors help infection and this is what happens when inhaling very large number of spores of various fungi, which are small in size, making it easier to enter and adhesion within the various tissues of the body2,3. In hospitals the infection occurs with various molds and yeasts either directly from one person to another or indirectly by its transition from the air and other instruments4. Air play a major role in the spread of various pathogens in hospitals is considered major factor in making contamination of the wards and halls of various surgery as it contains various germs on the dust5. The most common fungi in indoor environments for hospitals are saprophytic molds and yeasts, such as some species of Aspergillus spp, Penicillium spp, Cladosporium spp and Candida  spp6,7. Antiseptics are considered one of the most important materials used to reduce the number of pathogens and remove them from various materials and instruments to prevent the transmission and spread of diseases, the disinfection process is affected by various factors such as germs concentration, antiseptics concentration, disinfection period, temperature and pH8,9. The aim of this study is investigate the types of molds and yeasts contaminated the wards of the Al-Diwaniya Teaching Hospital and the effect of some antiseptics on the growth of these fungi.

Materials and Methods

Culture media

  1. Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium: Prepared according to the manufactured company’s instructions (Himedia India) by dissolving 65g of it in 1 liter of distilled water in a flask was then sterilized by autoclave at 121°C for 15 minutes and then remove the flask and left to cool and then added to 25 mg/L of antibacterial Chloramphenicol and adjust the pH at 5.6. This medium is used to isolate the fungi under study.
  2. Urea Agar medium: Prepared by dissolving 2.4g of urea base agar in 95 ml of distilled water in a flask and adjust the pH at 6.8, then sterilized by autoclave at 121°C for 15 minutes and then remove the flask and left to cool and added to it 5 ml of sterile urea solution by filtration with concentration 40% then distributed into test tubes with size 5 ml as a slant10. This medium is used to detect the production of urease enzyme.

Sample collection
120 samples were collected from wards of the Al-Diwaniya Teaching Hospital for the period from 5 April to 5 June 2016. In the collection of the samples were used sterile cotton swabs by opening it and move it in the required places which include (Floors and walls,  Instruments, Patients, Patients beds and Patients clothes) then these swabs were transported to the laboratory and cultured on Petri dishes containing (SDA) Sabouraud Dextrose Agar medium, the air samples were collected by open Petri dishes containing SDA medium and exposed to air of wards for 10 minutes with continuous movement to increase its exposure to the air, and then put all the dishes in the incubator at 25°C for 3 to 4 days for the purpose of fungal growth and identification this fungi11.

Isolation and identification of molds and yeasts
Identified fungi under study after purification depending on morphological features such as shape, color, diameter colony and height and also depending on the microscopic features such as the shape, size and color of fungal hyphae, spores and other reproductive structures according to the taxonomic placement12,13,14. also used some additional tests to identification yeasts according to15 as follows:

  1. Growth at 37°C: This test involved the growth of yeasts on SDA medium at 37°C for 7 days, the test is positive when the yeasts growth.
  2. Germ tube formation test: 0.3ml of human blood serum put in test tube and then transfer part of the colony of yeast under study in age (2-3) days to the test tube containing serum was then shaken well and incubated in incubator at 37°C for (2-3) hours after it put one drop of suspended yeast on a slide and then put the cover slide, It was microscopic examination to see germ tube as in the case of its formation, it is an indicator that a positive test and this special test of Candida albicans.
  3. Urease test: This test used to identify the Rhodotorula spp and Cryptococcus  spp and it involved inoculated test tubes containing the sterile urea agar medium with yeast to be identified using the sterilized needle and incubated in incubator at 25°C for (2-5) days and recorded the result, if the medium color changed from yellow to pink the result is positive.

All pure fungal isolates obtained were saved in test tubes with a capacity of 20ml containing slant SDA medium and maintained in refrigerator at 4°C until used, and then calculated the percentages of fungal contamination and occurrence and frequency of fungi according to the following equations16.

Sensitivity test of isolated fungi to some antiseptics
Testing involved use of Dettol (Chloroxylenol) and Hibitane (Chlorhexidine) and Formalin (Formaldehyde) at concentration 10% and then was prepared concentrations 7.5%, 5% and 2.5% by dilution with distilled water and sterilized by filtration using Millipore filter paper 0.45 um and then was transferred 3ml of each concentrations by sterile pipette into flasks containing 27ml of the SDA medium which placed in a water bath at a temperature 50°C and then distribute into plastic petri dishes with 90 mm in diameter with three replications for each concentration and left to become a solid and made a standard cylinder in the gel of dishes that containing antiseptics by sterile cork borer with diameter of 6mm and then filled with cylinders in the same size that cut from each pure colonies of fungi under study and incubated at (28-30)°C for 7 days, the results recorded by measuring the diameter of inhibition zone in units of a millimeter17, then calculated the percentage of inhibition according to the following equation:

Statistical analysis
One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test significant differences between the rates by Duncan multiple range test at 0.05 probability level 18.

RESULTS

Fungal contamination in the hospital wards

The results showed that the percentage of the fungal contamination in the wards was 77/120 (64.1%), highest of the fungal contamination was recorded in the floors and walls and in the air 18 (90%), followed by patients (Nose, Ear and Hands) 14 (70%) and lowest contamination was  in the instruments 3 (15%) (Table 1).
Table (1):
Percentages of fungal contamination in the hospital wards.

Location
Number of samples
Number of swabs that gave fungal growth
Fungal contamination (%)
Air
20
18
90
Floors and walls
20
18
90
Instruments
20
3
15
Patients (Nose, Ear and Hands)
20
14
70
Patients beds
20
11
55
Patients clothes
20
13
65
Total
120
77
64.1

Isolation and identification
In this study, 125 fungal isolates were obtained and identified as belonging to 9 genera comprising of Aspergillus spp with 52 isolates (mainly A. niger= 24, A. flavus= 19, A.  fumigates= 5 and A. ochraceus= 4). Penicillium spp with 17 isolates, Alternaria  alternata with 14 isolates, Candida  albicans with 11 isolates, Fusarium spp 9 isolates, Mucor spp 7 isolates, Rhizopus stolonifer 7 isolates, Cryptococcus spp 5 isolates and Rhodotorula spp 3 isolates. The highest occurrence and frequency percentages of fungi recorded for A. niger reaching (18.947%) and (19.2%) respectively, followed by A. flavus reaching (16.842%) and (15.2%) respectively with significant differences when compared with other fungi isolated in this study, while the lowest occurrence and frequency percentages recorded for Rhodotorula spp reaching (2.105%) and (2.4%) respectively. (Table 2).

Table (2):
Percentages of occurrence and frequency of fungi isolated from hospital wards.

Fungi
Number of samples that appeared the fungus
Occurrence (%)
Number of isolates
Frequency (%)
Alternaria alternata
11
11.578d
14
11.2d
Aspergillus flavus
16
16.842b
19
15.2b
Aspergillus fumigatus
4
4.210gh
5
4.0h
Aspergillus niger
18
18.947a
24
19.2a
Aspergillus ochraceus
3
3.157hi
4
3.2hi
Candida albicans
9
9.473e
11
8.8e
Cryptococcus spp
3
3.157hi
5
4.0h
Fusarium spp
6
6.315f
9
7.2f
Mucor spp
5
5.263fg
7
5.6g
Penicillium spp
14
14.736c
17
13.6c
Rhizopus stolonifer
4
4.210gh
7
5.6g
Rhodotorula spp
2
2.105i
3
2.4i
Total
95
125

Key– Percentages of occurrences and frequencies with the same letters did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between species of isolates.
Sensitivity of isolated fungi to antiseptics
The results showed that the antiseptics (Dettol, Hibitane and Formalin) have high inhibitory activity against the growth of all fungi studied when used at original concentration which was 10% and differing significantly (p<0.05) from other concentrations 7.5, 5 and 2.5% that used. Formalin showed highly significant effect in inhibitory activity for the growth of fungi from Dettol and Hibitane, the percentage of inhibition when using Formalin at concentration 10% ranged between (85.2-95.4%) while for Hibitane between (68.1-79.7%) and for Dettol between (40.6-65.8%) at the same concentration (Tables 3, 4 and 5).

Table (3):
Percentages of inhibition the growth of fungal isolates using different concentrations of Dettol.

Fungi Percentages (%) growth inhibition for Dettol concentrations
2.5 % 5 % 7.5% 10 %
Alternaria alternata 38.0 d 58.4 c 61.5 b 65.8 a
Aspergillus flavus 22.6 d 31.7 c 35.5 b 48.4 a
Aspergillus fumigatus 36.4 d 43.2 c 47.0 b 53.2 a
Aspergillus niger 34.7 d 58.1 c 60.3 b 64.5 a
Aspergillus ochraceus 23.9 d 35.7 c 42.2 b 48.6 a
Candida albicans 21.7 d 28.5 c 40.2 b 61.2 a
Cryptococcus spp 32.2 c 49.5 b 49.9 b 52.2 a
Fusarium spp 43.5 d 51.2 c 56.7 b 65.0 a
Mucor spp 30.2 d 47.5 c 49.1 b 53.8 a
Penicillium spp 20.6 c 21.4 c 37.6 b 54.6 a
Rhizopus stolonifer 15.7 c 16.4 c 38.7 b 40.6 a
Rhodotorula spp 30.7 d 46.3 c 49.5 b 52.3 a

Key-Percentage inhibitions by various species of fungi with the same letter at a particular concentration and between concentrations are not significantly different (p>0.05) at 95% confidence level.

Table (4):
Percentages of inhibition the growth of fungal isolates using different concentrations of Hibitane.

Fungi Percentages (%) growth inhibition for Hibitane concentrations
2.5 % 5 % 7.5% 10 %
Alternaria alternata 38.8 d 62.6c 67.3b 78.5a
Aspergillus flavus 32.6 d 36.3c 50.2b 68.1a
Aspergillus fumigatus 35.2 d 44.0c 66.8b 73.3a
Aspergillus niger 37.8 c 58.3b 60.7b 72.6a
Aspergillus ochraceus 28.6 c 38.9b 40.0b 72.7a
Candida albicans 22.4 d 33.5c 40.6b 70.7a
Cryptococcus spp 39.7 d 46.6c 69.4b 79.7a
Fusarium spp 46.8 d 58.3c 62.5b 71.4a
Mucor spp 34.0 d 52.4c 57.7b 78.2a
Penicillium spp 31.0 d 34.9c 44.8b 69.5a
Rhizopus stolonifer 29.6d 35.5c 52.6b 68.5a
Rhodotorula spp 20.8d 46.0c 55.8b 75.6a

Key-Percentage inhibitions by various species of fungi with the same letter at a particular concentration and between concentrations are not significantly different (p>0.05) at 95% confidence level.

Table (5):
Percentages of inhibition the growth of fungal isolates using different concentrations of Formalin.

Fungi Percentages (%) growth inhibition for Formalin concentrations
2.5 % 5 % 7.5% 10 %
Alternaria alternata 59.0 c 61.5 c 78.3 b 90.0 a
Aspergillus flavus 60.9 d 67.9 c 76.0 b 91.2 a
Aspergillus fumigatus 64.5 d 75.8 c 80.2 b 95.4 a
Aspergillus niger 59.8 d 65.7 c 75.4 b 88.7 a
Aspergillus ochraceus 68.4 d 74.6 c 82.5 b 90.4 a
Candida albicans 62.9 d 70.3 c 76.6 b 92.6 a
Cryptococcus spp 65.4 d 73.7 c 83.0 b 91.5 a
Fusarium spp 65.3 d 77.2 c 85.6 b 90.2 a
Mucor spp 66.7 c 75.9 b 78.5 b 85.2 a
Penicillium spp 58.7 d 65.5 c 77.4 b 87.3 a
Rhizopus stolonifer 60.2 d 69.3 c 77.7 b 86.7 a
Rhodotorula spp 62.6 c 64.6 c 74.7 b 93.0 a

Key-Percentage inhibitions by various species of fungi with the same letter at a particular concentration and between concentrations are not significantly different (p>0.05) at 95% confidence level.

DISCUSSION

Hospitals environment containing various microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria and fungi, so it is considered one of the most complex environments, the level of contamination in the hospital environment depends on many various factors such as: hospital size, hospital design, patients number, visitors number, ventilation system and methods used in the disinfection and sterilization processes19. In this study may be due reason for the high fungal contamination percentages in the floors and walls and in the air of the wards to the use of incorrect methods of ventilation process such as opening windows continuously and the entry of large amounts of dust which contains various germs and do not use antiseptics correctly in the disinfection process20,21. The decrease of fungal contamination percentages in the instruments may be due to these instruments often be immersed in antiseptics during use and these processes reduce the chances of occurrence of microorganisms contamination22. Generally species of Aspergillus spp have a high ability to produce various primary and secondary metabolites, which enables it to use various nutrients under various environmental conditions and this explains the recording of A. niger highest occurrence and frequency in the wards compared with other fungi under study23. As for the effect of antiseptics in the growth of various fungi has been reported24 that the effect of antiseptics least whenever they are used in diluted concentrations and that the reason for the presence of fungi as endemic in the wards despite disinfection and sterilization processes that occur may be due to random dilution of antiseptics or the use of only non-sterile water in the cleaning process which provides adequate moisture for fungal growth and spread in the environment, in addition to that these water may contain various germs. The high effect of Formalin on the growth of fungi under study compared with the effect of other antiseptics that used can be due to a little use of Formalin in hospitals because it irritate the tissue and has a strong odor and an expensive compared with Dettol and Hibitane which are used extensively in hospitals and in random concentrations which led to the development of resistance to them by various fungi as the frequent use of antiseptic without the other leads to a resistance factor due to a genetic mutation25. The presence of fungal contamination in the wards is require attention by the authorities responsible for it may cause secondary infections more dangerous than the primary infections that the patients came to the hospital for treatment and complications may occur lead to death26.

CONCLUSION

Depending on the results of the current study, the use of antiseptics in the original concentrations without dilution is the best way to reduce the contamination inside the hospital as well as the use of F0rmalin mainly in sterilization processes for their high effectiveness in eliminating contamination with microorganisms.

Declarations

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank all workers in the wards and laboratory of Al-Diwaniya teaching hospital for provide some materials and collect the samples that required in this study.

References
  1. Lee, Y.L., Thrupp, L.D., Lee, R., Nothrogel, S., Farsad, V., Cesario, T. Infections surveillance and antibiotic vitalization in a community-based skilled new sing facility. Aging-Milano., 1996; 18: 113-122.
  2. Cross, S. Mold spores: the unusual suspects in hay fever. Community Nurse., 1997; 3: 25-26.
  3. Kontoyiannis, D.P., Bodey, G.P. Invasive aspergillosis in 2002: an update. Eur. J. Clin. Microb. Infect Dis., 2002; 21: 161-172.
  4. Rath, J.D. Nosocomial infection in surgical wards. Arch. Int. Med., 2000; 35: 120-125.
  5. Buczynska, A., Cyprowski, M., Piotrowska, M., Szadkowska-Stanczyk, J. Indoor molds: results of the environmental study in office rooms. Med. Pr., 2007; 58: 521-525.
  6. Rainer, J., Peintner, U., Poder, R. Biodiversity and concentration of airborne fungi in a hospital environment. Mycopathologia., 2001; 149: 87-97.
  7. Perdelli, F., Cristina, M.L., Spagnolo, A.M., Dallera, B.S., Ottria, G., Grimaldi, M. Fungal contamination in hospital environments. Infect Control Hospital Ep., 2006; 27: 44-47.
  8. Russell, A.D. Activity of biocides against mycobacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. Symp. Suppl., 1996; 81: 87-101.
  9. McDonnell, G., Russell, A.D. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity action and resistance. Clin. Microb. Rev., 1999; 12: 147-179.
  10. Macfaddin, J.F. Biochemical Test for Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3rd edn. The William and Wilkins Company, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New York, London, Buenos Aires, Hong Kong, Sydney, Tokyo, 2000.
  11. Benson, R. Microbial Applications Laboratory Manual in General Microbiology, 3th edn. USA: McGraw, Hill, 2001.
  12. Gow, N.A., Robson, G.D., Gadd, G.M. The Fungal Colony. Published of Social Mycology. Cambridge University, 1997.
  13. De Hoog, G.S., Gene, J.C., Figueras, M.J. Atlas of Clinical Fungi. 2nd edn. Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, 2000.
  14. Watanabe, T. Pictorial Atlas of Soil and Seed Fungi Morphologies of Cultured Fungi and Key to Species, 3rd edn. USA: CRC press Washington, 2010.
  15. Ellis, D.H. Clinical Mycology. Human Opportunistic Mycoses. Australia: Gillingham, Printers Pty, Ltd, 1994; pp 166-167.
  16. Krebs, C.J. Ecology: the experimental analysis distribution and abundance. United Kingdom: Lincoln, Benjamin Cummings, 1997.
  17. Prize, C., Pauli, M., Bazerque, P. Antibiotic assay by the agar-well diffusion Method. J. Acta Biol., 1990; 15: 113-115.
  18. Wayne, W.D. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Science. 3rd edn. USA: 1983.
  19. Sessa, R., Di, P.M., Schiavoni, G., Santino, I., Altieri, A., Pinelli, S., Del, P.M. Microbiological indoor air quality in healthy buildings. New Microbiol., 2002; 25: 51-56.
  20. Credlich, T.A., James, R.A. A survey of respiration illnesses in a population. American J. Hygie., 1997; 75: 18-27.
  21. Abdollahi, A., Mahmoudzadeh, S. Microbial profile of air contamination in hospital wards. Iran J. Pathol., 2012; 7: 177-182.
  22. Miller, C.H., Palenik, D.J. Aseptic Techniques In: Infection Control and Management of Hazardous Materials for the Dental Team. 4th edn. St. Louis, Mosby, 2010.
  23. Yeghen, T., Kibbler, C.C., Prentice, H.G. Management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in hematology patients: a review of 87 consecutive cases at a single institution. Clin. Infect. Dis., 2000; 31: 859-868.
  24. Redal, K.M. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States. J. Infect. Dis., 1999; 16: 197-210.
  25. Sanglard, D., White, T.C. Molecular Principles of Antifungal Drug Resistance. In: Heitman, J. (Ed). Molecular Principles of Fungal Pathogenesis, USA: ASM Press, Washington D.C, 2006.
  26. Michell, T.G. Medical Mycology. Section V in: Medical Microbiology. USA: Editors Jawetz, Melnick, Adelbeog’s. 23rd edn. McGraw, Hill, 2004.

Article Metrics

Article View: 2948

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2017. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.