ISSN: 0973-7510

E-ISSN: 2581-690X

Grace Tona1, Oyebamiji Oyegoke2 , Sadiq Ademola1 and Jelili Akinlade1
1Department of Animal Production and Health, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
2Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2013;7(3):1731-1736
© The Author(s). 2013
Received: 06/04/2013 | Accepted: 18/05/2013 | Published: 30/09/2013
Abstract

The proximate, mineral content, total bacteria counts and  specific bacteria organisms present in 25 samples of raw cow milk and soft cheese prepared from the same bulked raw cow milk were investigated. Results showed that the proximate composition of raw cow milk and soft cheese samples were 13.18 and 23.17% total solids; 3.60 and 3.35% fat; 9.58 and 19.82% solids not fat; 4.61and 2.56% crude protein; 2.89 and 3.83% lactose; 2.08 and 3.43% ash and 2.44 and 2.34% casein respectively. The mineral content values were, 1016.50 and 1602.40 mg/L for calcium; 893.00 and 971.00 mg/L for phosphorus; 126.50 and 122.30 mg/L for magnesium; 652.50 and 830.80 mg/L for sodium and 2200.10 and 2601.20 mg/L for potassium for raw cow milk and soft cheese samples, respectively. The raw cow milk samples had higher bacteria counts of 19.0 x 10 5, 9.0 x 10 6, 4.0 x 10 7 and 2.0 x 10 8 cfu/ml, while the bacteria counts in the soft cheese samples were, 3.0 x 10 5, 4.0 x 10 6 and 2.0 x 10 7 cfu/ml. In summary, soft cheese had higher concentration of nutrients than the raw cow milk and there were higher bacteria counts in the raw cow milk than in the soft cheese samples.

Keywords

Raw cow milk, soft cheese, chemical composition, bacterial count

Article Metrics

Article View: 729

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2014. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.