Research Article | Open Access
Lakshmi Krishnasamy1 , Chitralekha Saikumar1 and Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel2
1Department of Microbiology, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai – 600 044, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.
2Genomic Research Laboratory, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai – 600 044, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.
J Pure Appl Microbiol, 2019, 13 (2): 1169-1174 | Article Number: 5635
Received: 28/03/2019 | Accepted: 02/05/2019 | Published: 30/06/2019
Abstract

Aerobic vaginitis (AV) is a condition in which the normal vaginal inhabitants are replaced by aerobic bacterial pathogens, triggering a vaginal immune response. AV should be treated promptly. The aim of the present study is to analyse the prevalence of AV in patients with clinical symptoms of vaginitis. High vaginal swabs were collected from 156 women with clinical suspicion of vaginitis , over a period of 1 year. The swabs were subjected to Gram stain and bacterial culture under aerobic conditions. The organisms were identified using standard microbiolgical methods and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed for the bacterial isolates as per CLSI guidelines. Out of the 156 samples processed aerobically, 33 showed bacterial growth in culture. The common bacteria isolated in the study were Staphylococcus aureus (24.2%), b-hemolytic Streptococcus (21.2%), Klebsiella species (21.2%), Escherichia coli (15.2%). Antibiotics like b-lactams/b-lactamase inhibitor combinations, Linezolid were effective against Gram positive bacteria. Gram negative bacteria were found to be more susceptible to Piperacillin Tazobactem, imipenem, meropenem, etc. The study emphasises the need for complete investigation of aerobic vaginal pathogens in patients with clinical symptoms of vaginitis.

Keywords

Aerobic vaginitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella, antibiotics.

Introduction

Vagina is equipped with normal physiological mechanisms to prevent the entry of pathogenic organisms1. An intricate balance of microorganisms like lactobacillus maintain the physiological mechanisms of vagina. Factors influencing the growth of pathogenic organisms in vagina are alterations in pH, vascularity, glycogen content, hormonal status, etc.

Vaginitis is a clinical condition in which the patient complaints of abnormal vaginal discharge, vaginal irritation, itching, etc2. Vaginitis is one of the frequent complaints of women visiting the gynaecology Out patients department3. Abnormal vaginal discharge in a patient could be due to infectious causes such as aerobic vaginitis, bacterial vaginosis (BV), trichomonial vaginitis (TV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) 2

In India, the prevalence of vaginal discharge is estimated to be 30%4. No definitive diagnosis could be made in many of the patients with clinical symptoms of abnormal vaginal discharge.2 Improper diagnosis of aerobic vaginitis may lead to treatment failure and recurrence of infections. They may even lead to severe complications in pregnancy like miscarriage, chorioamnionitis, premature rupture of membranes and preterm delivery5-7. Therefore, there is a great need for correct diagnosis of the condition to initiate a proper therapy. Bacterial vaginal infections are least understood and often the patients with vaginitis are started on empirical antifungal drugs without proper investigations. Appropriate diagnosis and management of the cases would help in reducing the recurrence of the infections as well as decreasing the emergence of drug resistance among the pathogens. Thus, the main aim of the study is to evaluate the aerobic bacterial flora in patients with clinical symptoms of vaginitis and study their antibiotic susceptibility profile.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital over a period of 1 year from January 2018 to December 2018. The study has been approved by the institutional ethical committee. Hundred and fifty six patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of vaginal infections were enrolled in the study. Their age ranged from 18 to 65 years. Patients with Bacterial vaginosis, trichomonial vaginitis, candidiasis were excluded from the study. A detailed history about the medical, surgical and other relevant history was obtained from all the patients using a Questionnaire after obtaining consent. Patients who were treated with any antibiotics in the past 1 month prior to the visit were excluded from the study.

Three high vaginal swab samples were collected aseptically from the lateral and posterior wall of the vagina of the patients, after inserting a sterile speculum. The swabs were transported immediately to the Microbiology laboratory and processed. First swab was used for Gram staining and the second swab for wet mount and the third was processed for bacterial culture aerobically. The swab was inoculated in Nutrient agar, Blood agar and Mac conkey agar and incubated at 37oC. After 24 hours of incubation, the plates were examined for the presence of growth.

The organisms grown in culture plates were identified using standard microbiological methods using biochemical reactions. The identification of the species of the bacteria were further confirmed by automated vitek 2 compact system. If no growth was observed, the plates were further incubated for 48 hours before reporting as no growth.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates was performed using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method using Muller Hinton agar plate as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The antibiotics used were obtained from Hi Media Laboratories Private Limited, Mumbai. The antimicrobial agents used in antibiotic susceptibility testing were penicillin (10µg), erythromycin (15µg), ampicillin (10µg), amoxycillin clavulanic acid (30µg), clindamycin (2µg), cefoxitin (30µg), amikacin (30µg), imipenem (10µg ), meropenem (10µg), cipro-floxacin (5µg), ceftriaxone (30µg), ceftazidime (30µg), piperacillin tazobactam (100/10µg), linezolid (30µg), cotrimoxazole (25µg), tobra-mycin (10µg), cefotaxime(30µg), ceftazidime (30µg) and gentamicin (10µg),

Microsoft excel was used for analysis of the results and the various data were expressed as percentages.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients with clinical suspicion of vaginitis were included in the study. Out of the 156 high vaginal swab samples, 33 yielded bacterial growth under aerobic conditions. So, the prevalence rate of aerobic vaginitis in our study was 21.2%.

The study group included women of age ranged from 15 to 65 years. The rate of isolation of bacterial aerobic pathogens was found to be more in the age group of 21 – 30 years followed by 31-40 years, as depicted in table 1.

Table (1):
Age wise distribution of cases

Age group ( years)
No. of samples

(n = 156)

No. of culture positive samples ( n =33)
<20
3
1
20-30
72
17
31-40
48
9
41-50
18
3
51-60
12
2
>60
3
1

The common aerobic bacteria causing vaginitis isolated in the present study were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella species, b-haemolytic streptococci. (Table 3)

Table (2):
Bacteria isolated in the present study

Organisms
No of isolates
Percentage (%)
Staphylococcus aureus
8
24.2
β haemolytic streptococci
7
21.2
Enterococcus sp.
2
6
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus
2
6
Klebsiella sp.
7
21.2
Escherichia coli
5
15.2
Pseudomonas sp.
2
6

There was higher rate of isolation of Gram positive organisms in the current study (Fig. 1).

The Gram Negative isolates were highly susceptible to meropenem and imipenem. They showed moderate susceptibility towards cephalosporins and aminoglycosides.

Fig. 1. Distribution of microorganisms

 

Table (3):
Percentage of Sensitivity of Gram positive organisms to various antibiotics:

Antibiotics
Staphylococcus aureus

(n=8) (%)

β haemolytic streptococci

(n=7) (%)

Enterococcus sp.

(n=2) (%)

Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus

(n=2) (%)

Penicillin
4 (50)
5 (71.4)
1 (50)
2(100)
Erythromycin
4 (50)
5 (71.4)
NT
1(50)
Ampicillin
6 (75)
6 (85.7)
2 (100)
NT
Amoxycillin clavulanic acid
6 (75)
7 (100)
2 (100)
2(100)
Ciprofloxacin
6 (75)
5 (71.4)
2 (100)
2 (100)
Clindamycin
6 (75)
6 (85.7)
NT
1(50)
Linezolid
8 (100)
7 (100)
2 (100)
2 (100)
Cefoxitin
6 (75)
4 (57.1)
NT
1(50)

NT : Not tested

Table (4):
Percentage of Sensitivity of Gram Negative isolates to various antibiotics:

Antibiotics
Klebsiella sp

(n=7) (%)

Escherichia coli

(n=5) (%)

Pseudomonas sp.

(n=2) (%)

Piperacillin Tazobactem
6 (85.7)
3 (60)
1 (50)
Imipenem
6 (85.7)
5 (100)
0
Meropenem
7 (100)
5 (100)
1(50)
Gentamicin
4 (57.1)
5 (100)
1(50)
Amikacin
4 (57.1)
3 (60)
1(50)
Cefotaxime
2 (28.5)
1 (20)
1(50)
Ceftazidime
3 (42.8)
1 (20)
0
Ciprofloxacin
2 (28.5)
4 (80)
1(50)
Cotrimoxazole
2 (28.5)
2 (40)
NT
Tobramycin
4 (57.1)
NT
1(50)

NT : Not tested

DISCUSSION

Vaginitis is a clinical condition which may lead to significant discomfort, morbidity and even recurrent medical visits. These infections, if left untreated may lead to complications, especially in pregnant women and women of child bearing age group8.

The prevalence of vaginitis due to aerobic bacterial pathogens in this study was 21.2%, which correlates well with the previous studies by Sangeetha et al. (2015) who reported 20.8% prevalence in patients of reproductive age and another study by Fan et al (2013) who reported a prevalence rate of 23.74% in their study9,10.

Another study from Solapur, Maharashtra showed 37% prevalence of bacterial vaginitis in their study which could be due to the variation in the hygienic conditions of the patients. All these studies highlight that aerobic bacteria are also one of the frequent causes of vaginitis and hence, the practice of empirical antifungal therapy for most of the cases of vaginitis without investigation needs to be revised.
In the present study, the prevalence of aerobic vaginitis was more in the women of reproductive age group of 20-30 years (51.5%) followed by 30-40 years (27.3%). This is in accordance with the previous studies by Kahn et al. and Sangeetha et al.8,9.

Staphylococcus aureus (24.2%) was found to be the most common Gram positive cocci isolated in the present study followed by Group B streptococci (GBS) (21.2%). In the previous study by Yancey et al, GBS was present in 26% of the cases11. However, in a study done in Kerala, only 12% of the cases had GBS colonisation.12 Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS) is usually considered as a probable skin commensal. CONS has been isolated from 6% of the cases in our study.

Enterobacteriaceae are often isolated from patients with vaginitis in reproductive age group in various studies reported by Swamy et al., (2015), Mohamed et al., (2015) and Kumar et al., (2015)13-15. This could be due to the poor hygiene and entry of the gut flora into genital tract causing vaginal infections13-15. Similar to the previous study by Lakshmi et al, 2012, Escherichia coli has been isolated from 15 % of the cases16. However, Klebsiella species were found to be the most pathogenic Gram negative bacteria in this study, unlike the previous report in which Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated organism16. Pseudomonas species has been found in 6% of the cases.

Susceptibility testing of the isolates revealed that piperacillin tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem are the antibiotics of choice for treating the infections caused due to Gram negative isolates. The Gram negative bacteria also showed a moderate susceptibility rate towards gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin. For Gram positive bacteria, Linezolid, amoxicillin clavulanic acid, ampicillin, clindamycin showed a good susceptibility rate followed by ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and cefoxitin.

Appropriate detection of vaginal infections is important in all age groups for better management of the cases. However, the detection of vaginitis in reproductive age group especially during pregnancy is significant due to the high risk of transmission of bacterial infections to the neonates during their delivery period by Group B streptococci, Escherichia coli and other coliforms leading to sepsis in the newborn17. Thus, appropriate diagnosis and management of vaginitis cases would help in minimisation of complications as well as reduction in recurrence of such infections. Further, proper usage of antimicrobials helps in prevention of emergence of resistant organisms.

CONCLUSION

Vaginitis is one of the frequently occurring condition in women of all ages. The present study provides information regarding the prevalence of aerobic bacterial pathogens in patients suffering from vaginitis. The efficient management of the vaginitis cases depends on the appropriate diagnosis of the causative agent to initiate the correct therapy and prevent the consequences of the vaginitis. Further, this may help in judicial usage of the antimicrobial drugs preventing the emergence of resistant bugs. Appropriate diagnosis of the vaginitis cases using standard microbiological methods with complete antimicrobial susceptibility testing is highly recommended.

Declarations

Acknowledgments
None

Conflict Of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contribution
All authors have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding
None.

Data Availability
All datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Ethics Statement
The study has been approved by the Institutional Research committee and Institutional Human Ethical committee.

References
  1. Lakshmi K., Chitralekha S., Illamani V. and Menezes G.A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginal infections in Pre and Postmenopausal women. Int. J. Pharm. Bio. Sci., 2012; 3(4): (B) 949 – 956.
  2. Schorge J., Schaffer J., Halvorson L., Hoffman B., Bradshaw K., Cunningham F.G. Williams Gynecology, Second Edition, New York : McGraw- Hill Company; 2012. Chap 3: p. 547.
  3. Forbes B.A., Daniel F.S., Alice S.W. Baily and Scott’s diagnostic microbiology. 12th ed. USA: Mosby Elsevier Company; 2007; 860.
  4. Masand D., Patel J., Gupta S. Utility of Microbiological Profile of Symptomatic Vaginal Discharge in Rural Women of Reproductive Age Group. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2015; 9(3): QC04-QC07
  5. Donati L., Di Vico A., Nucci M., Quagliozzi L., Spagnuolo T., Labianca A., et al. Vaginal microbial ora and outcome of pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2010; 281: 589-600.
  6. Tansarli G.S., Kostaras E.K., Athanasiou S., Falagas M.E. Prevalence and treatment of aerobic vaginitis among non-pregnant women: Evaluation of the evidence for an underestimated clinical entity. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 2013; 32: 977-84.
  7. Pereira N., Edlind T.D., Schlievert P.M., Nyirjesy P. Vaginal toxic shock reaction triggering desquamative inflammatory vaginitis. J. Low Genit. Tract Dis., 2013; 17: 88-91.
  8. Khan I, Khan UA. A hospital based study of frequency of aerobic pathogens in vaginal infections. J. Rawal Med. Coll., 2004; 29(1):22-5.
  9. Sangeetha K.T., Golia S., Vasudha C.L. A study of aerobic bacterial pathogens associated with vaginitis in reproductive age group women (15-45 years) and their sensitivity pattern. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci., 2015; 3: 2268-73.
  10. Fan A., Yue Y., Geng N., Zhang H., Wang Y., Xue F. Aerobic vaginitis and mixed infections: comparison of clinical and laboratory findings. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2013; 287: 329–35.
  11. Yancey M.K., Duff P., Clark P., Kurtzer T., Frentzen B.H., Kubilis P. Peripartum infection associated with vaginal group B streptococcal colonization. Obstet Gynecol. ,1994 8 4(5): 816-9.
  12. Anna Cherian and Sasikumari, O. Microbial Profile of High Vaginal Swab from Women of Reproductive Age Group in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 2017; 6(7): 2366-2370. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.338
  13. Swamy N, Ramalingappa P, Bhatara U. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern of Microorganisms Isolated from Vaginal Infections at a Tertiary Hospital in Bangalore, India. International Journal of Medical Students, 2015; 3(1):34-39
  14. Mohamed H., Shalaby N., El-Maraghy N. and Baraia Z. Prevalence of Vaginal Infection and Associated Risk Health Behaviours Among Married Women in Ismailia City. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 2015; 4(5): 555-567
  15. Kumar G., Singh K. Microbial Profile of High Vaginal Swab From Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age Group: Data from Tertiary Care Hospital. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2015; 4(7): 2672-2673.
  16. Lakshmi K., Chitralekha S., Illamani V., Menezes G.A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginal infections in asymptomatic diabetic women. Jour of Med. Sci. & Tech., 2012; 1(3): 9 – 15.
  17. Sadiya Shaikh, Prakash Waghmare, Anu Sharma, Kishor Ingole and Rashmi Bawane. A Retrospective Evaluation of Vaginitis in Women of Reproductive Age Group in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Solapur, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 2018; 7(02): 762-768.( doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.096.

Article Metrics

Article View: 3501

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.