ISSN: 0973-7510

E-ISSN: 2581-690X

Research Article | Open Access
Vasil S. Boyanov , Alexandra S. Alexandrova and Raina T. Gergova
Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Article Number: 10231 | © The Author(s). 2025
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2025;19(4):2779-2787. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.19.4.16
Received: 12 January 2025 | Accepted: 20 September 2025 | Published online: 03 November 2025
Issue online: December 2025
Abstract

Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus, GBS) is a pathogen associated with severe diseases in newborn and immunocompromised patients. One of the commonly used approaches for GBS identification is the CAMP test. It represents enhance of hemolysis when co-cultivating GBS with a β-toxin producing strain of S. aureus. In recent years, in addition to false positive results observed in other bacterial species, CAMP-negative GBS isolates have also been reported, questioning the specificity and sensitivity of the test. CAMP-negative phenotype is characterized by a lack of expression or deletion of cfb gene. According to data, the CovR/S regulatory system, β-hemolysin/cytolysin (cylE), and C5a protease (scpB) genes are possibly involved in the expression of a CAMP-factor. In our study 14 strains out of 294 (4.8%) were tested phenotypically negative for CAMP-factor, but positive for cfb gene. Among the CAMP-negative isolates the antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed resistance rates of 71.4%, 42.9%, and 100.0% for macrolides, lincosamides, and tetracyclines, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates accounted for 42.9%. Detected serotypes were Ia (35.7%), III (21.4%), V (21.4%), and IV (7.1%). Frequencies of the analyzed virulence factors were as follows: cylE (85.7%) and scpB (92.9%). There was no statistical significance regarding antibiotic resistance and the distribution of the examined virulence genes between strains with CAMP-positive and negative phenotypes. The current study indicated that although the CAMP-test serves as an effective screening diagnostic tool, it is crucial to combine it with additional methods to obtain a conclusive microbiological diagnosis of GBS.

Keywords

S. agalactiae, GBS, CAMP-test, CAMP-negative Phenotype

Article Metrics

Article View: 121

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.