Open Access
Ali J. Hammod1 , Nihad A. Ali2, Ali M. Alkassar3 and Yasser J. Jameel4
1College of Agriculture, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.
2College of Agriculture, University of AL-Qasim Green, Babil, Iraq.
3College of veterinary medicine, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.
4College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kerbala, Karbala, Iraq.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2018;12(2):807-813
https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.12.2.42 | © The Author(s). 2018
Received: 25/02/2018 | Accepted: 19/04/2018 | Published: 30/06/2018
Abstract

This experiment was carried out in the poultry farm of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kufa, from 24/10/2016 to 29/11/2017. Two hundred fourty unsexed one – day old Ross broiler’s chicks were allocated to four treatments in two replicates of 30 chicks each. The treatments were: T1 (control)contained corn without date pits; T2 (5% date pits replacement of corn) ; T3 (10% date pits replacement of corn).T4(15% date pits replacement of corn).The results showed that no significant differences in live body weight , feed intake during the periods 0–5 weeks of age while there were significant differences(pd”0.05)in feed conversion ratio and the best value recorded in (T1)1.72 and the lowest in (T4) 1.84 which contained 15% date pits.. No significant differences in the percentage of giblets weight, intestinal length, carcass weight, dressing percentage, cut-up parts of carcass. It can be concluded that it is possible to completely replace date pits at 15% for corn without negative effects on dressing percentage and carcass cuts.

Keywords

Date pits, Broiler diet, Chicks, Dressing, cereal

Introduction

Poultry feeding is a great bother to poultry industry in Iraq. know that the cost of feed in broiler production could reach 75% of the total operational production cost. Nutritionists have attempted to reduce feed cost by using locally available cheaper unconventional feedstuffs(Alkassar,2010). A raw material feeding import amounted to 800,000 tones  in 2014 So the production of energy rich cereal grains in iraq for incorporation in poultry feeds is lacking and the industry relies on costly, irregular unguaranteed raw material important. Iraq is the largest producer of dates in the world with 16.492 million date palm trees producing 17.6% of the world date, 676,111 tones in the year 2014)  General Statically Organization – Iraq,2013).  The date pits(DP) which produced, especially from the industry of date confectionery could be partly substituted imported corn or other cereals in poultry feed. About 11-18% of date fruit weight is the seed which is composed of carbohydrates, dietary fiber, fat, ash and protein (Hussein et al,1998).Kamel et al(1981) found that date pits up to 15% added to chicks diets supported growth similar to birds fed control diets. The addition of date pits and date fruits to the diets significantly improved the body weight gain(BWG)of chicks as compared to chicks fed the control diet, after the first 2 weeks of the experiment. In addition, including date pits at 10% level to the finisher diets improved BWG and feed conversion ratio(FCR) of broiler chicks(Hussein et al,1998). (Vandpopulere et al,1995)suggested that date pits at levels ranging from 5 – 27% could be included in broiler diets with no deleterious effect on growth performance.(El-Hag,et al,1995; Al-Maezooqi et al,2000) concluded that date fiber could be used up to 15% in broiler and layer diets with no significant reduction in performance. Weight gains of broiler receiving diets containing 10% uncooked date pits were increased as compared to birds fed the control diet(Hussein and Alhadrami,2003). (Tabook et al,2006) showed that substitution of corn by 10-15%  date fiber in broiler diet  significantly decreased  nitrogen corrected apparent metabolisable energy(AMEn).They also reported that the inclusion of date fiber in the broiler diets except at 5% depressed average BWG,feed intake (FI)and FCR.(Jumah et al,1973) found a gradual reduction in BWG of broiler diets included varying levels 0,5,15% of date pits. The extracts of date palm flesh and pits have been reported to have free radical scavenging activity(Chaira et al,2007). The phenols content in date seed oil were also found to be higher than the olive oil and can be a good source for natural phenolic compounds (Besbes et al., 2004c). In another study, 2015 ¼g Gallic acid/g of phenolic content have been directly extracted from the seed of a variety of date fruit (Amany et al., 2012). review had shown that the total tocols content of date seed oil found by( Nehdi et al,2010) is higher than that of olive oil. The review also shown that the antioxidant content in date seed oil is higher than commercial virgin coconut oil (Marina et al., 2009b). The proteins, mineral ions and fat contents in date seeds make it as a valuable ingredient in animal feed production (Ali-Mohamed and Khamis, 2004).

A study conducted by Hussein et al. (1998) on chicks diet had shown that the body weight and feed utilization of the chicks improved as the chicks were fed on diet that had been enriched with date seed.

(Aldhaheri et al,2004) found that the feeding studies using date seed as a part of the diet of Windstar rats gave no effect to the testosterone level of male rats, while the increase in date seed intake by the female Windstar rats caused the estradiol in the rat’s serum level to decrease. In addition, the nickel which is toxic to plants and animals have been found to occur in low amount in date seed compared to coffee and barley, which indicate the safety level of the date seed to be used as a food or animal feed ingredient (Ali-Mohamed and Khamis, 2004).Other than the date seed, the date seed oil also found to be beneficial to be used for the health purpose which is also known as the oleic-linoleic oil is due to the high content of both oleic and linoleic acid (Nehdi et al., 2010).The oleic acid plays an important role for the prevention of the cardiovascular disease. Oleic acid which categorized as long chain fatty acid that is taken in diet is increased the high density lipoprotein (HDL) content in blood, and at the same time lowering the low density lipoprotein (LDL) content (Gilmore et al., 2011). This condition could prevent cardiovascular diseases. A study had been conducted on the effect of sperm quality after supplemented with date seed oil (Fatma et al., 2009). The study that have been carried out on 16 men aged from 25 to 45 years old found that the level of lipid peroxidation of spermatozoa added with date seed oil decreased significantly. They also found that the ability of sperms to initiate the acrosome reaction (when the sperm cells meet the oocyte) have also improved. As a result, the capability of the sperm to fertilize the oocyte is increase , They concluded that the protection against the lipid peroxidation was due to the presence of natural antioxidants in date seed oil. The objective of this study is to investigate the possibility of substitute cheap dates pits as potential alternative for expensive conventional feed using the high carbohydrate content. The response of broiler to partial replacement of corn was studied by taking parameters of broiler growth, feed intake, feed conversion ratios (FCR),and carcass traits during starter and grower periods .

Materials and Methods

Experimental procedure
Each experimental group was fed ad-libitum with its own diet for 42 d. Feed intake ,gain weight and feed conversion ratio were determined in each period weekly. The study was conducted according to the International Guidelines for research involving animals (Directive 2010/63/EU),specially slaughtering birds according to the Islamic procedures

Bird husbandry
240 day-old (four groups of 60 chicks each), commercial broiler chicks from the Ross  strain were obtained from a private hatchery at Babylon town in middle of Iraq. On arrival at the site of the experiment at the factuality of veterinary medicine poultry farms(Semi closed house) contained floor pens were weighed(average 38 gm/bird) and divided into four groups of 60 chicks each. The groups were assigned at random to four experimental diets. of 3 replicates, 20 chicks each . Birds of all treatments were reared on similar environmental and management conditions through 35days of the feeding period. birds were treated and vaccinated according to the recommended practices in commercial operations. Birds were housed on a floor of a suitable size house and were managed as any commercial broiler flock. At the end of 35 days of age, ten birds were taken randomly from each replicate. Chicks were killed according to the routine practices adopted in commercial boiler slaughterhouse. Weights of visceral organs like liver, heart, kidneys, were recorded as percent of live body weight. Total hot carcass weight was recorded then each carcass was split into cuts, each cut and weight was recorded. Weights of wings, neck, head, and feet were also recorded.

Table (1):
Approximate composition of date pits (%)

Moisture
10
Crude protein%
7.0
Ether extract %
6.8
Crude fiber %
18.0
Ash %
2.0
NFE %
56.2

Table (2):
Starter and finisher experimental diets used in the experiment

Treatment
Ingredient composition Starter diets Grower diets
T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4
Yellow corn 58.0 55.1 52.2 49.3 60.0 57.0 54.0 51.0
Date pits —— 2.9 5.8 8.7 —- 3.0 6.0 9.0
Soybean meal 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Protein Conc.* 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Corn Oil —- —- —- —– 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Di calcium phosphate 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Limestone 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Common salt 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Chemical analysis
Crude protein% 22.80 22.75 22.70 22.65 20.60 20.55 20.50 20.45
M.E Kcal/kg 2912.00 2912.00 2912.00 2912.00 3130.00 3130.00 3130.00 3130.00
Methionine% 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47
Meth+Cys % 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Lysine% 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
Ca% 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Available P% 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Crude fiber% 3.60 4.10 4.60 5.10 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
C/P Ratio 127.70 128.00 128.30 128.60 151.90 152.30 152.70 153.00

* The protein concentration(provimi :3304(5%)-Jordan, provided the following per kilogram of diet: ME 2000Kcal;Crude protein
40%;Fat 3%;Fiber 5%;Ca 6.5%;Lys. 3.5%;Aval.P 5.5%;Na
2.5%;Cl 2.4%;Methionine 4.5%;Meth+Cys. 4.9%; vitamin A;200000 IU ;V.D3 60000 IU;V.E 500 mg; V.K 65 mg; V.B1 20 mg;V.
B2 110 mg;V.B3 600mg;V.B5 160 mg; V.B6 50mg; V .B9 12mg;V.B1.20 mg;Biotin 2000mg;Choline 8000mg;Fe 880mg;Zn
1250mg;Mn 1240mg;Cu 100mg;Se 4mg;I 18mg;BHT 175 mg;Phytase 20000Iu.

Table (3):
Effects of different levels of date pits on the average of broiler performance

Treatments
Starter.W.G (g/bird)1-14 d
Grower.W.G (g/bird) 15-35d
F.I/starter period(g/bird)
F.I grower period(g/bird)
Starter (F.C.R)
Grower (F.G.R)
T1 (control)
370.3
1817.1
459.5
**3307.1b
1.16
1.82c
T2 (5%D.P)
383.1
1820.3
452.0
3367.5b
1.18
1.85c
T3 (10%D.P)
359.4
1850.1
427.6
3515.2a
1.19
1.90b
T4 (15%D.P)
340.5
1865.5
408.6
3656.4a
1.20
1.96a
Significant
N.S*
N.S
N.S
P ≤ 0.05
N.S
P ≤ 0.05

*N.S:mean no significant difference
**Means in the same columns with different superscripts were significantly (p<0.05) Different

Table (4):
Accumulative broiler performance at all experimental periods

Treatments
Weight gain1-35d
Feed intake 1-35d
Feed conversion ratio 1-35d
T1 (control)
2187.4
3766.6 b
**1.72 c
T2 (5%D.P)
2203.4
3819.5 b
1.73 c
T3 (10%D.P)
2209.5
3942.8 a
1.78 b
T4 (15%D.P)
2206.0
4065.0 a
1.84 a
significant
N.S*
N.S
P ≤ 0.05

*N.S:mean no significant difference
**Means in the same columns with different superscripts were significantly (p<0.05) Different

Table (5):
Effects of different levels of date pits on broiler dressing & carcass cuts &external organs

Treatments
Live wt.(g)
Carcass wt(g)
D%*
Thighs
Breast
Neck
Wing
Back
Feet
Head
T1 (control)
2225.4
1584.4
71.2
22.5
20.4
5.5
8.3
14.5
4.3
2.6
T2 (5%D.P)
2241.4
1613.8
72.0
22.6
20.3
5.3
8.4
14.3
4.2
2.4
T3 (10%D.P)
2247.5
1620.4
72.1
22.6
20.3
5.3
8.4
14.3
4.2
2.4
T4 (15%D.P)
2244.0
1617.9
72.1
22.6
20.3
5.3
8.4
14.3
4.2
2.3
Significant
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S

*D%: dressing percent
N.S:mean no significant difference

Experimental Diet
The experimental rations were formulated at the experiment site. Raw ingredients were bought from local market then mixed into rations to fit the NRC (1994) requirements. Four types of rations were formulated, the starter and the growing diets. The starter diets were fed from day 1 to day 14.

Starting from age of 15 days, growing diets were fed till the end of the experiment (day 35).A controlled conventional diet was composed of soybean,corn, and concentrates. Table (1) shows the chemical analysis of dait pits powder,table(2) shows of  composition experimental diet which was used for feeding. crush dates  pits were incorporated in diets at 5, 10, and 15%replacing corn. The pits are grinding before being fed to animals. The diets used in the experiment as shown in Table (2) were as follows:

  1. Basal diet without date pits.
  2. Basal diet with 5% date pits.
  3. Basal diet with 10 % date pits.
  4. Basal diet with 15% date pits.

Date pits was added to replace similar percentages of corn. The food and water was provided ad-libitum. All diets were iso calories& iso crude protein.

Dates analysis
Table(1) show The chemical analysis of whole dates was obtained from date  pits by a dry sample weighing 200g. The sample was analyzed to yield information on moisture content, crude protein, ether extract, and total ash according to the procedure of (AOAC), 1998.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of date was performed on the basis of one way analysis of variance (ANOVA).All experimental data were analysis according to SAS as a complete  randomized  design.All statements of significance are based a probability (Pd”0.05).The mean values were compared by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

Table (6):
Effects of different levels of date pits on broilers visceral organs and gastrointestinal tract segments (Mean as % live weight)

Treatments
Gizzard
Liver
Heart
esophagus
crop
Lung
trachea
provintriculus
SI
cecum
T1 (control)
3.1
2.1
0.58
0.09
0.10
0.58
0.05
0.11
3.9
0.30
T2 (5%D.P)
3.0
2.1
0.6
0.10
0.10
0.59
0.05
0.11
4.1
0.33
T3 (10%D.P)
3.0
2.0
0.6
0.10
0.10
0.60
0.05
0.11
4.3
0.34
T4 (15%D.P)
3.0
2.0
0.6
0.10
0.10
0.61
0.05
0.11
4.7
0.38
Significant
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S

N.S: mean no significant difference

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table (3) and statistical analysis show no significant differences in weight gain trait among all treatment in starter7 finisher periods, this mean that  nutritive value for date pits closely to corn, this result agreed with (Vandepopuliere et al.,1995) indicated that there was no significant effect in bodyweight at the age of week 3 when date with and without seed was substituted with corn in boiler diet. While our result didn’t agreed with many studies (Batal and Parsons, 2004; Taha et al., 2013) and these differences may be due to the strain of broiler and type of treatments. also there was no significant differences in feed intake during starter period, and found that less value 408.6 gm/bird in T4(15% D.P instead of corn)vs. T1 control diet which recorded  459.5 gm/bird. while in finisher periods appear significant differences trends to control diets(without date pits) .the highest feed intake was 3656.4g/bird, and the lowest value in T1 3307.0g/bird, these differences may be due to the less of available energy in date pits because of the birds eat to satisfy their needs of energy. this result agreed with The result agreed with Al-Mafraji et al., 1999, who found significant increase in feed intake due to date pits to broiler diet. A similar result proved by Taha 2013 reported that there is a significant increase infeed intake when date flesh is added to broiler ration under heat stress while (Al-yousif and Vandepopuliere, 1985) didn’t find any significant difference between performance characteristics of birds which are fed whole date at levels8, 16, and 24% and control group. Feed conversion ration didn’t differ among all treatment in starter period. while appeared differences in finisher period and the best value recorded in T1(control)  1.82 g feed/ g gain and the lowest value in T4(15% date pits)  1.96 g feed/ g gain at probability( Pd” 0.05),this result showed that the nutritive value of corn more than date pits because of less fiber and corn more digestibility than date pits. This result agree with the findings of (Kamel et al, 1981) who indicated that the replacement of maize by whole dates resulted in decreased growth performance and, increased the feed conversion ratio. The result disagree the several researchers who reported that a good performance of broiler was found when they were fed with diets supplemented with whole dates or date pulp (El-Deek et al., 2010; Hussein et al. 1998).

In general, table(4) showed that (T2) and control treatment(T1) were the best in feed conversion ratio value at age 35 day 1.73,1.72 respectively and no significant differences between them ,however, broilers in T4(15% D.P) recorded the large value (1.84) which was best significantly (p d”0.05)more than T3(1.78),these results mean that feed FCR increased as date pits percent increase in ration,this may be due to increase the fiber percent in diets because of the high percent fiber percent in date pits and this causes exciting more feed in feces with low digestibility.

The level of date pits had no significant effect on carcass cuts (Thighs, Breast, Neck, Wing, Back,feet,head)percentage as shown in table(5). The best weights of carcass were observed of chicks receiving date pits also carcass cuts percente . At the same time, these chicks had the lowest weights of non-edible cuts as head and feet. Thesefindings may explain the increased body gain and feed conversion efficiencies observed in the chicks receiving 5,10,15% date pits instead of corn. As indicated earlier, the broiler chicks on date pits diets had the  equal quantity of heaviest meat  with control treatment (corn without date pits)as indicated by breast or thigh meat contents.There are several factors that affect the dressing percent of an animal, these is the type of diet which will have influence on performance of that animal.

Level of date pits had no significant effect on weightsof the edible organs: gizzard, liver, heart, as % live weight (Table 6). Similar findings werereported when broilers were fed diets high in fiber in replacement of corn(Kamel et. al., 1981). However, Also, levels of date pits had no significant effect on the percent of of the inedible organs: esophagus, crop, lungs, provintriculus, trachea (Table 6).Weights recorded for these organs were the same as those of broilers consuming regular broiler diets. However, researchers found that fiber levels had certain influence on gastrointestinal tract and its accessory organs. Abo omar and Gavoret (1995); Rabayaa (2000) and Abu Ghazala(2004) showed the effect of different levels of fiber on these parameters.Even though fiber had variable effects on the measured parameters, fiberdifferently exerted its effect.The chicks consuming date pits at rate of 15% instea of corn had higher, percents ofsmall intestine compared to control treatment groups, This study results agreemented with Similar findings were observed when date pits diets were fed to broiler chicks and in rats receiving a high fiber diets (Dunaif and Sheeman, 1981).The highest percent of large intestine was in the chicks consuming date pits in their diets, while the lowest weights were for chicks consuming the control diet. Similar trend was observed for percents of cecum, where the control chicks had the lowest cecum percents. This results may be due to high fiber levels when fed to monogastric animals, increased the colon and rectum weights (Pekas et al., 1983).

In conclusion, including date pits broiler diet up tp 9% showed growth performance comparable to the corn .The advantage in using date pits in broiler feed had positive effect on their performance and will be of no harmful effects and might be economically feasible because of they are an inexpensive feed ingredient found in Iraq.

Our recommendation that ,date pits are cheap by –products with high energy content that can provide a potential alternative for conventional energy feed ingredients in the poultry industry. This will help reduction of reliance on foreign imports of raw materials, will cope with international policies of relying on agro-industrial by –products for animal feed to reduce competition with man for cereals and to help reducing environmental pollution.

References
  1. Abo Omar, J. and L. Gavoret. Utilizing olive cake in fattening rations. Vet. Med. Rev. 1995; 146(4): 273-276.
  2. Aldhaheri, A., Alhadrami, G., Aboalnaga, N., Wasfi, I. and Elridi, M. Chemical composition of date pits and reproductive hormonal status of rats fed date pits. Food Chemistry, 2004; 86: 93-97.
  3. Ali-Mohamed, A. Y. and Khamis, A. S. H. Mineral ion content of the seeds of six cultivars of Bahraini date palm (Phoenix dactylfera). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2004; 52: 6522-6525.
  4. Alkassar,A.M.A.2010.Poultry nutrition.book,1st ed.kufa university-faculity of vet.med.iraq.
  5. Al-Mafragy, A. Y. The use of dibs in rearing broiler and its effects on some physiological and production parameters. MSc thesis. College of VeterinaryMedicine. Baghdad University, 1999; (Physiology).
  6. Al-Marzooqi,W.,A.Al-Halhali,R.Al-Maqbaly,A.A.Ritchie,K.Annamalai and N.E.Forsberg, Date fiber as aconstituent of broiler starter diets.Agricultural Science, 2000; 5: 59-61.
  7. Al-yousef, Y., R. L. Belyea, and J. M. vandepopuliere. Sodium hydroxide treatment of date pits. Proc second symp on date date palms, King Faisal Univ, Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia, 1986; pp 103-104.
  8. Amany, M. M. B., Shaker, M. A. and Abeer, A. K. Antioxidant activities of date pits in a model meat system. International Food Research Journal, 2012; 19: 223-227.
  9. AOAC. Official method of analysis. 18th Edn.,Association of official analytical chemists. WashingtonDC., 1998; USA.
  10. Batal, A. B. and Parsons, C. M. Utilization of various carbohydrate sources as affected by age in the chick, Poultry Science, 2004; 83(7), PP.
  11. Besbes, S., Blecker, C., Deroanne, C., Drira, N. E and Attia, H. Date seeds: chemical composition and characteristic profiles of the lipid fraction. Food Chemistry, 2004a; 84: 577-584.
  12. Directive 2010/63/EU Of The European Parliament And Of The Council of 22 September 2010. Official Journal of the European Union.
  13. Duniaf, G. and B. o. Sheeman. The effect of dietary fiber on pancreatic enzyme activity in vitro. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 1981; 33: 575-583.
  14. El-Deek, A. A., Al-Harthi, A. A., Yakout, H. M. Use of enzymes to supplemented diets containing date waste meal for Lohmann white layers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2008; 7(4): 397-407.
  15. El-Hag,M.G. and K.M.Al-Shargi, Performance of laying hens on concentrate and by-products based diets. Intl.J.Anim.Sci. 1995 10: 181-183.
  16. Fatma, B. A., Nozha, C. F., Ines, D., Hamadi, A., Basma, H. and Leila, A. K. Sperm quality improvement after date seed oil in vitro supplementation in spontaneous and induced oxidative stress. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2009; 11: 393-398.
  17. Date Production Report .2013. Central Statistical Organization, Ministry of Planning. Republic of Iraq
  18. Gilmore, L. A., Walzem, R. L., Crouse, S. F., Smith, D. R., Adams, T. H., Vaidyanathan, V., Cao, X. and Smith, S. B. Consumption of high-oleic acid ground beef increases HDL-cholesterol concentration but both high- and low-oleic acid ground beef decrease HDL particle diameter in normo cholesterolemic men. The Journal of Nutrition 2011; 141: 1188-1194.
  19. Hussein,A.S. and G.A.Alhadrami, Effrect of enzyme supplementation and diets containing date pits on growth and feed utilization of broiler chicks. Agric.Marine Sci., 2003; 8: 67-71.
  20. Hussein,A.S. and G.A.Alhadrami and Y.H.Khalil, The use of dates and date pits in broiler starter and finisher diets. Bioresource Technology, 1998; 66: 219-223.
  21. Jumah,H.F.,I.I. Al-Azzawi and S.A.Al-Hashimi, Some nutritional aspects of feeding ground date pits for broilers. Mesopotamia J.Agric., 1973; 8: 139-145 .
  22. Kamel,B.S.,M.F.Diab,M.A.Iliau and A.J.Salman, Nutritional value of whole dates and date pits in broiler rations. Poul.Sci, 1981; 60: 1005- 1011.
  23. Marina, A. M., Che Man, Y. B., Nazimah, S. A. H. and Amin, I. Chemical properties of virgin coconut oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 2009b; 86: 301-307.
  24. Nehdi, I., Omri, S., Khalil, M. I. and Al-Resayes, S.I. Characteristics and chemical composition of date palm (Pheonix canariensis) seeds and seeds oil. Industrial Crops and Products 2010; 32: 360-365.
  25. National Research Council, NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th -Ed. Acad. Sci. Washington D.C. USA 1994.
  26. Pekas, J. C., J. Yen and W. G. Pond. Gastrointestinal tract, carcass and performance traits of obese versus lean genotype swine. Effect of dietary fiber. Nutr. Rep. Int. 1983; 27: 259-257.
  27. Rabayaa, 1. Utilization of olive pulp in poultry rations. MS Theses. An-Najah N. University, Nablus, Palestine 2000.
  28. SAS. Statiatical Analysis System. User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina 1996.
  29. Tabook,N.M.,I.T.Kadim,O.Mahgoub and W.Al-Marzooqi, The effect of date fiber supplementation with an exogenous enzyme on the performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 2006; 47:73-82.
  30. Taha, H. J. Al-Yasri, Mayada, F. M., Firase M. H.Alkhilani. Effect of addition different levels of dates flesh (Phoenix dactyliphera L) to ration contain probiotic on boiler chickens performance reared under heat stress. I. J. A. B. R, 2013; 3(2).
  31. Vandepopulier,J.M.,Y.Al-Yousif and J.J.Lyons, Dates and date pits as ingredients in broiler starter and coturinx quail breeder diets. Poultry Science, 1995; 74: 1134-1142.

Article Metrics

Article View: 2889

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.