Mary Shama, Hridhya.K.V and M. Kulandhaivel

Department of Microbiology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore.

ABSTRACT

Medicinal plants are widely used for the treatment of different diseases. The purpose of this study is to observe the antibacterial and minimum inhibitory concentration of ethanolic leaves extract of three medicinal plants (Psidium guajava, Ficus religiosa, Cardiospermum halicacabum) against gram positive (Streptococcus pyogenes, or Group A Streptococcus) and gram negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Proteus species) isolated from clinical skin samples. The antibacterial activity and minimum inhibitory concentration of plant extracts were determined by using agar well diffusion method and well plate method respectively. The plants extracts showed varied levels of antimicrobial activity against the gram positive and gram negative bacteria. The ethanolic extracts of three medicinal plants showed a broad spectrum antibacterial activity against the panel of pathogens. This study indicated clear evidence supporting the traditional use of the plants in treating skin diseases related to bacteria. The present study thus suggests the use of these medicinal plants in the treatment of various skin infections.

Keywords: Bacterial skin infection, Medicinal plants, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Proteus sp., Psidium guajava, Ficus religiosa, Cardiospermum halicacabum.

INTRODUCTION

For centuries, the therapeutic properties of various medicinal plants have been used to treat human diseases. In herbal medicine, crude plant extracts in the form of infusion, decoction, tincture or herbal extract are traditionally used by the population for the treatment of diseases, including infectious diseases. Although their efficacy and mechanisms of action have not been tested scientifically in most cases, these simple medicinal preparations often mediate beneficial responses due to their active chemical constituents (Barnes et al., 2007)[1]. Plant-derived products contain a great diversity of phytochemicals such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, lignin, and other small compounds (Cowan, 1999) [2]. These compounds possess numerous health-related effects such as antibacterial, antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, antithrombotic and vasodilatory activities (Bidlack et al., 2000) [3].

The expanding bacterial resistance to antibiotics has become a growing concern worldwide (Gardam, 2000) [4]. Increasing bacterial resistance is prompting resurgences in research on the antimicrobial role of herbs against resistant strains (Alviano and Alviano, 2009) [5]. A vast number of medicinal plants have been recognized as valuable resources of natural antimicrobial compounds (Mahady, 2005) [6].Medicinal plant extracts offer considerable potential for the development of new agents effective against infections which are difficult to treat (Iwu et al., 1999) [7]. A wide range of phytochemicals present in plants is known to inhibit bacterial pathogens (Cowan, 1999; Medina et al., 2005; Romero et al., 2005). [2, 8, 9]

Apart from the expensive costs of some antibiotics, most of the clinically important antibiotics have major setbacks. A good number of conventional antibiotics have been found to be neurotoxic, nephrotoxic and hypertensive, and few others cause severe damage to the liver and bone marrow depression (Chong and Pagano, 1997) [10]. The primary benefit of using herbal drugs is that they are relatively safer and cheaper than the synthetic alternatives (Aiyegoro and Okoh, 2009) [11]. In addition, herbal medicine is a complex mixture of different phytochemicals acting by different mechanisms, which makes it difficult for pathogens to develop resistance (Daferera et al., 2003) [12].

In this study, the three medicinal plants, (Table 1) dried leaves extract was made in ethanol solvent. These extracts were used to examine antibacterial activity by agar well diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration, by microdilution method against Escherichia coli, Proteus species, Streptococcus pyogenes, or Group A Streptococcus, which are common cause of skin infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of Plants Materials
Medicinal plants reported were collected from Trivandrum, India. The plants leaves were rinsed with water to remove soil and dust particles. Then they were shade dried and grinded. The grinded plants materials were passed through 0.125 mesh sieve to remove debris and store in a sterile air tight container.

Extraction of Plant Material
Ethanolic leaf extracts of all the three selected plants were prepared. 100gm of air dried and powdered leaves of each plant were soaked in 100 ml of 70% ethanol for 72 hours. Each mixture was stirred for every 24 hours using a sterile glass rod. At the end of extraction each extract was passed through Whatman Filter Paper No.1. The ethanolic extract obtained was concentrated at 300C and then stored in air tight containers at 4C.

 Antimicrobial assay
Isolation and identification of bacterial strains
Three pathogenic bacterial strains, Escherichia coli, Proteus species, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Group A Streptococcus were collected from Metro Scans and Laboratories, Trivandrum, India. The three bacterial strains were maintained in blood agar at 37C for further studies.

Preparation of Inoculum
For the antibacterial activity test, the bacteria were aerobically cultures in nutrient broth at 37C for 24 hours and then suspended in sterile saline at a density equivalent to that OD 0.5 McFarland standards. The culture was inoculated over Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) plates. Bacterial suspension with a concentration of 105cfu/ml was used in vitro antibacterial activity test.

Antibacterial activity by Well Diffusion Method
The antimicrobial activity of the plant extracts were evaluated using Agar Well Diffusion Method (Eloff 1998, Perez et al., 1990) [13, 14]. 0.1 ml of diluted inoculum (105cfu/ml) of the bacterial strains were swabbed on the Muller Hinton Agar plates.  Wells of 5mm diameter were punched into the agar plates with the help of sterilized cork borer (5mm). Using micropipette, 100 µl of the plant extracts were added to the wells made in the plate.  The plates were incubated aerobically at 37C for 24 hours. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by measuring the zone of inhibition (mm).  (Table 2)

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each plant extract was determined using broth microdilution method (Tripathi 2013; Fabry et al., 1998) [15, 16].  Two fold serial dilutions of each plant extract were added to the wells of sterile 96 well plates containing inoculated nutrient agar medium 100 µl with a bacterial concentration of 105cfu/ml. Escherichia coli, Proteus species and Streptococcus pyogenes were used as the test organism. Samples were dissolved in the solvent to a final concentration of 10mg/ml and added in increasing concentration such as 31.25, 62.5, 125, 500, 1000µg. Following 24 hour incubation at 37C, the MIC was determined as the lowest concentration that completely inhibited the growth of the bacteria by measuring the optical density (OD) at 630 nm using a spectrophotometer. The OD was measured immediately after the visual reading.  The growth inhibition for the test wells at each plant extracts dilution was determined by the formula,

Percentage of Inhibition = (OD of Control – OD of Test)/ (OD of Control) X 100%

RESULTS

In this study, three medicinal plants were selected according to their traditional usage for the treatment of skin infections and associated symptoms. The plants by their scientific and common names, traditional use, plant part used are listed in the Table.1.  All plants are extracted with ethanol. In this study ethanol is used as extraction solvent because it is relatively safe when compared with other organic solvent. Further, ethanol extraction is widely used to obtain crude extracts of phytochemicals from plant materials in the herbal medicine industry for therapeutic applications.

All the plants extracts exhibited different levels of antibacterial activities and appeared to have the best activity at the extract concentration 10mg/ml in the agar well diffusion method. (Table.2). The result in the Table.3 shows the average minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the selected medicinal plants extracts on gram positive and gram negative bacteria obtained using microdilution method.

Discussion

Nature has bestowed a very rich botanical wealth, and a large number of diverse types of plants grow in different parts of the world. Antimicrobial agents of plant origin have enormous therapeutic potential. They are effective in the treatment of infectious diseases, and simultaneously they also mitigate many of the side effects that are often associated with synthetic antimicrobials (Rios and Recio) [17].

Hence, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the role of antimicrobial agents of plant origin in inhibition of the growth of Escherichia coli, Proteus species and Streptococcus pyogenes. The results demonstrate that the effectiveness of the mentioned plant extracts against the pathogens tested.  All strains were susceptible to the extracts. The extracts show significant activity against the investigated microbial strains. Although the bacterial used in the study are different, the active components present in the extracts have the capability of destroying bacterial cell wall which inevitably inhibits the growth of bacteria. Isolation and purification of phytoconstituents from these plants may yield significant novel antimicrobials, as plant based antimicrobials have enormous therapeutic potential as they can serve the purpose without any adverse effects that are often associated with synthetic compounds.

Conclusion

These results provide a rationalization for the use of these medicinal plants for the treatment and control of various infections in traditional medicine. Further studies, toxicity study can be conducted on the extracts of these plants to evaluate the safe limit of their dosage and consumption and formulation of the selected medicinal plants.

 Table 1. Profile of medicinal plants used

Botanical Name Family Name Common Name Plant Parts Used Therapeutic Uses
Psidium guajava Myrtaceae Guava Leaves Ulcers, boils, rheumatic places and the chewing of the leaves to relieve toothache, oral ulcers,treating diarrhea, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension
Ficus religiosa Moraceae Banyan tree Leaves Treatment of ulcers, asthma, heart disease, viral infection, bacterial infection, and protozoan infections
Cardiospermum halicacabum

 

Sapindaceae Balloon Wine Leaves Treatment of rheumatism, nervous diseases, stiffness of the limbs, skin infection, Asthma, Abdominal disease, anemia etc.

 

Table 2. The antibacterial activity of ethanolic extracts of medicinal plants against selected skin pathogens

Ethanolic Extract Concentration

(mg/ml)

Zone of Inhibition (mm)
Streptococcus pyogenes Proteus sp. Escherichia coli
 

Psidium guajava

10 17 16 12
7.5 13 13 11
5.0 12 12 8.0
2.5 5.0
 

Ficus religiosa

10 13 13 14
7.5 11 11 11
5.0 10 6.0 10
2.5 8.0 8.0 6.0
 

Cardiospermum halicacabum

10 12 8.0 12
7.5 11 5.0 10
5.0 10 6.0 9.0
2.5 8.0 4.0 7.0

 

Table 3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Medicinal plants against Tested organisms

Plants Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
Streptococcus pyogenes Proteus sp.

 

Escherichia coli

 

Psidium guajava 483.940µg 557.462µg 602.460µg
Ficus religiosa 501.082µg 611.216µg 621.096µg
Cardiospermum halicacabum 480.201 µg 516.459 µg 558.099 µg

 

References

  1. Barnes J, Anderson LA, Phillipson JD, Herbal Medicines, 3rd Ed, 2007, Pharmaceutical Press, London.
  2. Cowan MM, Plant products as antimicrobial agents, Clin.Microbiology. Rev., 1999, 12:564– 582.
  3. Bidlack WR, Omaye ST, Meskin MS, and Topham DKW, Phytochemicals as Bioactive Agents. 2000, CRC press, Boca Raton, FL
  4. Gardam MA, Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus an emerging community pathogen? A review of the literature. Can. J. Infect. Dis., 2000, 11:202-211.
  5. Alviano DS and Alviano CS, Plant extracts: search for new alternatives to treat microbialdiseases. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2009, 10:106-121.
  6. Mahady GB, Medicinal plants for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections.Curr. Pharm. Des., 2005, 11:2405-2427.
  7. Iwu MW, Duncan AR, Okunji CO, New antimicrobials of Plant Origin. In: J. Janick, Ed. Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, 1999.pp.457-462.
  8. Medina AL, Lucero ME, Holguin FO, Estell RE, Posakony JF, Simon J, MO’Connell, Composition and antimicrobial activity of Anemopsis californica leaf oil. J. Food Chem., 2005, 53:8694-8698.
  9. Romero CD, Choph SE, Buck G, Martinez E, Garcia M, Bixby L, Antibacterial properties of common herbal remedies of the southwest. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2005, 99:253-257.
  10. Chong KT, Pagano PJ, In vitro combination of pnv-140690, a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor with ritonavir against ritonavir- sensitive and resistant clinical isolates. Antimicrobe. Agents Chemo., 1997, 41(2): 2367-2377.
  11. Aiyegoro OA and Okoh AI, Use of bioactive plant products in combination with standaredantibiotics:Implications in antimicrobial chemotherapy. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 2009, 3(13): 1147-1152
  12. Daferera DJ, Ziogas BN, Polission M, The effectiveness of plant essential oils on the growth of botrytis cinerea, fusarium sp. and clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Crop Prot, 2003, 22: 39-44.
  13. Eloff JN, Which extractant should be used for the screening and isolation of antimicrobial components from plants? Ethanopharmacol, 1998; 60:1-8.
  14. Perez C, Pauli M, Bazerque P, An antibiotic assay by agar well-diffusion method. Acta Biologiae et Medecine Experimentaalis, 1990; 15:113-115.
  15. Tripathi KD, Essentials of Medical Pharmacology(7th ed.), 2013, New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. pp. 696,697.
  16. Fabry W, Okemo PO, Ansorg R. Antibacterial activity of East African medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998; 60:79–84.
  17. Rìos JL, Recio MC, Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology,2005, 100:80-4.